Best Current Practices in for IPv6 Address Allocation
This Best Practices document aims to provide IPv6 Address allocation guidelines that a network operator can follow while planning the IPv6 subnetting for its network (based on the issues faced and learning’s from IPv6 implementation in NKN and NIC network).
Best Current Practice:
IPv6 addresses generally written in Hex format. Each Hex number represents 4 bit, commonly known as nibble. A nibble boundary is a network mask that aligns on a 4-bit boundary. Subnetting the v6 address at nibble boundary improves efficiency and make it easier to understand for humans* (Machine will anyway read it binary format).
Example of Nibble and non-Nibble Boundaries Subnetting
From the above example, we can clearly see that Subnetting at the Nibble boundaries is easier to manage and do the subnetting.
* Condition may arise where you may have to do non-Nibble based subnetting. It depends on case-to-case basis But Nibble boundaries based subnetting is the recommended one.
A /64 IPv6 segment provides 64 bits for network and hosts both. Every LAN segment should be provided /64 prefix regardless the size of the same. An IEEE’s 64-bit Extended Unique Identifier EUI-64 format (method by which host can automatically assign itself a unique ipv6 address) needs a LAN segment of /64.
/64 subnet is also required for Stateless Address Auto Configuration (SLAAC, refer RFC 4862).
In case of point-to-point network, there is a flexibility of using /64 or /126 or /127 segment. As ip addresses are generally assigned manually in point-to-point link, so no benefit in using /64. If addresses are assigned to point-to-point link through SLAAC or EUI-64, then /64 is the only available option.
In case of manual assignment, /127 is the subnet which comes in mind. In some cases, we may face an issue called “subnet-router anycast” in routers while using /127 for point-to-point link (refer rfc 3627 for more details). The best available option will be using /126 for Point-to-point Links.
For multi-homing in IPv6, minimum /48 segment is required. Every customer/Site should be allocated a /48 segment, irrespective of the size/LAN of the Region/Customer.Next /48 should be reserved for every Customer/Site so as allocate the same if needed in future.
There should always be a scope for further expansion of the network. Inefficient planning and little or no scope for expansion will led to end up in inefficient v6 address allocation and will also led to increase in the v6 routing table. As mentioned above, every site/region should be allocated /48 v6 block. In addition of this next /48 block should be reserved for that site. Continuous allocation helps in aggregation two /48 into single /47 segment (which will help us in minimizing the size of the v6 routing table).
Infrastructure incl. Loopback addresses, WAN Links and others. First /48 from ISP resource pool should be reserved for this. We can further subnet this /48 into multiple /64 segments.
Loopback is the most common address and in majority of times, it is used in configuration. It should be as concise as possible so as to help human in remember the same. Using first /48 from an ISP pool of /32 or /30 (or whatever the pool is) helps in suppressing the address to the maximum extent.
As for example, Suppose 2405:8A00::/32 is the ISP ipv6 address block, then we will have a following /48 subnet from the same :-
As clearly visible in above example, first /48 contains all zeros which can be combining to represent the segment in best concise manner. Loopback address needs to be /128 only. First /48 can be further segmented into multiple /64 and first /64 block will be used for loopback address allocation.
By using /64 segment, a scope is there for 2^64 unique loopback v6 addresses (which is more than enough for whole internetJ). As per current practice, use numeral only in last octet and leave alphabets altogether.
For e.g.:- Suppose loopback segment is 2405:8A00::/64. Loopback addresses will be 2405:8A00::1/128, 2405:8A00::2/128, 2405:8A00::3/128, …… 2405:8A00::9/128. The next sequential address will be 2405:8A00::A/128. But as per best practice, this will be ignored (having alphabet in last octet).
Useful loopback addresses will be like:-
Point-to-point links or WAN links requires only 2 useful addresses. Here any of the /127 or /126 or /64 can be used. It depends on the network design altogether. Whatever be used, uniformity should be maintained. As per practice, /126 is the optimal option as it save us from ‘subnet-router anycast’ and also use the address space from efficiently. /64 can be separated out from the Infrastructure pool for this purpose.